Statistics without Tears: An Introduction for Non-Mathematicians

Product Information

Catchment areas depend on the demography of the area and the accessibility of the health center or hospital. Accessibility has three dimensions – physical, economic and social.[ 2] Physical accessibility is the time required to travel to the health center or medical facility. It depends on the topography of the area (e.g. hill and tribal areas with poor roads have problems of physical accessibility). Economic accessibility is the paying capacity of the people for services. Poverty may limit health seeking behavior if the person cannot afford the bus fare to the health center even if the health services may be free of charge. It may also involve absence from work which, for daily wage earners, is a major economic disincentive. Social factors such as caste, culture, language, etc. may adversely affect accessibility to health facility if the treating physician is not conversant with the local language and customs. In such situations, the patient may feel more comfortable with traditional healers. To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. have a stats test tomorrow, revising the concepts actually made sense.. very grateful but we will see how it goes A sample may be defined as random if every individual in the population being sampled has an equal likelihood of being included. Random sampling is the basis of all good sampling techniques and disallows any method of selection based on volunteering or the choice of groups of people known to be cooperative.[ 3]

Statistics Without Tears: An Introduction for Non-Mathematicians Statistics Without Tears: An Introduction for Non-Mathematicians

the possibility of bias in samples, the distinction between significance and importance, the fact that correlation does not imply causation, and that people sometimes simply get things wrong.' Regardless, this should be the first book anyone should read if they want an introduction to the world of statistics. It contains no calculations and it is very engaging. In retrospect, these appear to be mistakes. As an aspiring trader, my world is deeply tied to statistics and programming languages (although I still think “R” is ugly). Reading “Statistics Without Tears” slowly chipped away at my prejudice toward the subject. Derek Rowntree writes and educates in a way that I believe most statistics teachers can only dream of doing. Instead of dosing off during the book’s “lectures,” like I did in university ones (on the ones I didn’t skip), this book had me hooked from beginning to end. When generalizing from observations made on a sample to a larger population, certain issues will dictate judgment. For example, generalizing from observations made on the mental health status of a sample of lawyers in Delhi to the mental health status of all lawyers in Delhi is a formalized procedure, in so far as the errors (sampling or random) which this may hazard can, to some extent, be calculated in advance. However, if we attempt to generalize further, for instance, about the mental statuses of all lawyers in the country as a whole, we hazard further pitfalls which cannot be specified in advance. We do not know to what extent the study sample and population of Delhi is typical of the larger population – that of the whole country – to which it belongs. Rowntree wants you to understand the concepts instead of the formulas, so it makes the read easier. If you ever had to do null-hypothesis testing in school decades ago, the content should come easy to you.

Latest News

So why read this book? Because the undergrads I taught this term, and probably the postgrads I’ll teach next term, appear petrified and confused by quantitative methods. It’s so difficult to tell whether students are really grasping the concepts you explain in lectures, particularly when there’s no exam to test comprehension. These are social science students and their prior exposure to stats seems to have been minimal. When I spotted this book in library, I wondered if it could help me to explain the basics more clearly. And I think it just might. I found it very easy to follow and a helpful reminder. Rowntree’s explanation of the difference between parametric and non-parametric tests is especially lucid and useful. That said, I doubt I'll have time to include such careful and painstaking explanations in my lectures. I’ll definitely recommend the book to students, though. It’s not at all fashionable to suggest students read entire books, but honestly I think this one is much better than an explanatory video, the more trendy teaching medium. I have a rather irregular history with statistics. After disliking maths GCSE but getting a very good mark, I avoided A-level maths like the plague. Upon arriving at university as a fresh-faced undergrad, I was disconcerted to discover that the first year of my social science degree included a compulsory statistics module. I passed that, then chose modules with no maths for the remaining two years. My dissertation was entirely qualitative. When I returned to studying as postgrad years later, I’d grudgingly come to accept that statistics are useful. My masters course included two statistics modules, which I appreciated the purpose of without enjoying. Then somehow, during the peculiar derangement of my PhD, I ended up teaching myself to use a fairly complex statistical methodology: multinomial logistic regression. The majority of my PhD research was quantitative. Now I find myself actually teaching statistics to undergrads. My 18 year old self would be amazed and horrified. It’s quite possible that I’m still outgrowing an ingrained dislike of maths that has much more to do with uninspired school teaching than the subject itself. In any case, I have a decent grasp of what stats are and why they’re useful, by social science standards. By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services Eh, it was ok. I'm not sure why these books seem to be so against updating to show use cases with current computational software (R, Python,...even...ugh, Excel), but they do seem to cavil at the idea of it. That would be fine, as I read this book looking for any little intuitions that I may have missed about some basic topics, but unfortunately, both the intuitions and the theoretical portions felt half finished. If you're looking for a refresher on statistics that helps with intuitions, I would definitely go with Head First Statistics over this one. In statistics, a population is an entire group about which some information is required to be ascertained. A statistical population need not consist only of people. We can have population of heights, weights, BMIs, hemoglobin levels, events, outcomes, so long as the population is well defined with explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. In selecting a population for study, the research question or purpose of the study will suggest a suitable definition of the population to be studied, in terms of location and restriction to a particular age group, sex or occupation. The population must be fully defined so that those to be included and excluded are clearly spelt out (inclusion and exclusion criteria). For example, if we say that our study populations are all lawyers in Delhi, we should state whether those lawyers are included who have retired, are working part-time, or non-practicing, or those who have left the city but still registered at Delhi.

Statistics without Tears! - BOPA Statistics without Tears! - BOPA

A brief and informative read that helped me review the statistics material I had studied, but I need to qualify that by saying this will not be enough. It's a good starting point, and if you've studied statistics before then it will remind you of the terms and help you conceptually. However, you will need to supplement this with other reading and practice centred around why you want to understand statistics and the tools you want to use. Concise introduction and refresher on statistics that is suitable for both math-intensive and non-math intensive majors. Only a short review here as others have written superbly on this book. I read this item cover to cover for a maths and algorithms university module and found it an excellent cornerstone to work on the rest of learning material. Like another reviewer here I've spent years running away from anything that looked remotely mathematical. Depending on the type of exposure being studied, there may or may not be a range of choice of cohort populations exposed to it who may form a larger population from which one has to select a study sample. For instance, if one is exploring association between occupational hazard such as job stress in health care workers in intensive care units (ICUs) and subsequent development of drug addiction, one has to, by the very nature of the research question, select health care workers working in ICUs. On the other hand, cause effect study for association between head injury and epilepsy offers a much wider range of possible cohorts.

Research workers in the early 19th century endeavored to survey entire populations. This feat was tedious, and the research work suffered accordingly. Current researchers work only with a small portion of the whole population (a sample) from which they draw inferences about the population from which the sample was drawn. This book was probably the most lucidly written book that I have come across that explains Statistics to a person entirely alien to the field. Clinical and demographic characteristics define the target population, the large set of people in the world to which the results of the study will be generalized (e.g. all schizophrenics). Rowntree says at the end If you feel I've raised more questions in your mind than I've answered, I shan't be surprised or apologetic. The library shelves groan with the weight of books in which you'll find answers to such questions (p185), although having said that to my eyes this is pretty comprehensive for a non-technical reader and the kinds of questions it has raised are not ones I require answers to. The book is clear and plainly explained with worked examples it is written in a seminar style - so the flow is interrupted by mini-questions. I was interested by one example which set out how by doing a single tailed analysis in a drugs trial you can potentially skew the presentation of the result to make a drug appear far more effective than it is ( Lies, damned lies and statistics afterall)

Statistics Without Tears A Primer For Non Mathematicians ( 1981) Statistics Without Tears A Primer For Non Mathematicians ( 1981)

Aside from the mathematical complexities, I was plagued by programming languages that seem to have been designed by dinosaurs (I’m looking at you, “R”) and interaction with material that I thought I would have no relationship with following my graduation.

Article contents

I consider this a must-read if you've ever taken postsecondary or college-level math (which would have covered the basic statistics mentioned in the book).